Subscribe now

The Intolerance of Tolerance

By D. A. Carson
July 2012 | Review by Robert Strivens

Synopsis

We live in a culture obsessed with the idea of 'tolerance'. However, when tolerance, poorly defined, is made an absolute good, it drifts towards intolerance. It must then, argues D. A. Carson, be thoughtfully challenged, both for the good of the church and for the good of the broader culture. Carson examines how the definition of tolerance has changed. It now has less to do with putting up with a person or stance while still seeking to disagree, and more to do with not saying others are wrong. It is impossible to deploy this new tolerance consistently, so that actual practice is often whimsical and arbitrary. Worse, the words 'tolerance' and 'intolerance' have become merely rhetorical terms of approval and disapprobation. Despite the many negatives about these new, often ethically deficient definitions of tolerance, from a Christian perspective there have been gains as well. In this valuable and accessible volume, Carson uses examples and quotations to illustrate his analysis and concludes with practical advice on exemplifying and promoting the virtue of civil civic discourse.

  • Publisher: IVP
  • ISBN: 978-1-84474-405-3
  • Pages: 192
  • Price: 12.99
Buy this book »

Book Review

The Intolerance of Tolerance

D A Carson

IVP

192 pages, £12.99

ISBN: 978-1-84474-405-3

Star Rating: 4

 

The benefits department of Dudley Council in the West Midlands apparently once banned all representations of pigs from its offices, for fear of upsetting Muslims. The Co-op Bank requested the organisation Christian Voice to close their accounts with the bank because of their public stance opposing homosexual behaviour. Dartmouth College, in the USA, forbade the distribution by Campus Crusade of C. S. Lewis’s Mere Christianity, as that work might have offended non-Christians.

      Don Carson provides page after page of example of this kind of thing in The Intolerance of Tolerance, most, though not all, directed against Christians. The surprising fact, he says, is, not that there is disagreement with Christian beliefs, or even that such beliefs meet with derision, but that this is done in the name of tolerance.

      Carson’s main argument is that this modern-day tolerance is a very different thing from the tolerance of an earlier age. The earlier tolerance saw no difficulty in allowing the expression of strong views which differed from the received view of society as a whole. That was, in fact, the essence of tolerance – to allow the expression of dissenting opinions. Today, by contrast, tolerance increasingly means, not allowing, but silencing particular views on the grounds that they may offend those who hold contrary opinions. Hence the scenarios described above.

      Don Carson argues that this modern tolerance is itself ‘intrinsically intolerant’. It (wrongly) believes itself to occupy the moral high ground, but is actually ‘socially dangerous’ and ‘intellectually debilitating’. Whereas the older kind of tolerance demanded that competing viewpoints enter into debate amongst themselves, the new intolerance simply closes down all such discussion.

      Underlying this new tolerance, as Carson goes on to show, is a moral relativism that believes that the old norms (heterosexual monogamous marriage, for example) simply do not hold any more. Under this new way of thinking, it just does not matter who has sex with whom, provided that both parties are adults and consent. It is no longer a moral issue. Hence, the thinking goes, issues of morality arise now, not in relation to the practice of any particular sexual practice, but when someone has the temerity to argue that some such practice is wrong.

      These developments are alarming for the Christian, as their effect is to render illegitimate the public expression of precisely the kind of exclusive truth claims which lie at the heart of the Christian faith. This new tolerance thus tends to the privatisation of religion. Carson rightly warns believers not to give in to such pressures. He ends his book with ‘ten words’ – principles which help Christians to maintain a biblically faithful testimony in societies where the new tolerance reigns. These are all worth pondering, but particularly pertinent to all believers are the exhortations to continue to proclaim and argue publicly for Christian truth, to evangelise and to delight and trust in God, who is still sovereign.

      This book will repay careful reading by all who are interested in and concerned by the way in which our society increasingly marginalises the exclusive truth claims of the Christian faith.

 

Robert Strivens,

London Theological Seminary

 

Book Reviews

Read our latest book reviews

Star RatingStar RatingStar RatingStar RatingStar Rating
If I Could Speak: Letters from the Womb
Mark Jones

Abortion statistics for the UK are eye-watering and outrageous. There are about 220,000 abortions per year. That is 25 every hour, of every day. At least one baby will have been murdered in the time taken to read this short…

See all book reviews
Star RatingStar RatingStar RatingStar RatingStar Rating
Pray Big: Learn to Pray Like an Apostle
Alistair Begg

Of the making of books on prayer there seems to be no end. That fact probably reflects the need that almost of all of us feel for more help in this vitally important area of our Christian lives The problem,…

Star RatingStar RatingStar RatingStar RatingStar Rating
FILM REVIEW: Matthew Henry — The life and times of the Bible commentator
Dan Pugh

Although the name of Matthew Henry has become synonymous with the whole-Bible commentary which he authored in the early 18th century, there is also much to learn from his remarkable life and the tumultuous times through which he lived. This…

Star RatingStar RatingStar RatingStar RatingStar Rating
Ephesians (Tyndale New Testament Commentary)
Darrell L Bock

Whenever a new commentary is published from the conservative viewpoint on a book of the Bible which is already well covered, there ought to be few issues of concern because there is so much literature with which to compare it.…